Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
MINI REVIEW
Original Article
ORIGNAL ARTICLE
PICTORIAL ESSAY
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Review Article
Review Systematic
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
MINI REVIEW
Original Article
ORIGNAL ARTICLE
PICTORIAL ESSAY
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Review Article
Review Systematic
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
5 (
1
); 4-5
doi:
10.1055/s-0039-1692599

Orthopaedic Surgeons and Smartphones

Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Qena Faculty of Medicine and Its University Hospital, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
Address for correspondence Ahmed M. Ahmed, MBBCh, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Qena Faculty of Medicine and Its University Hospital, South Valley University, Kilo 6 Qena-Safaga highway, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt (e-mail: drahmedabdou1993@gmail.com).
Licence
This open access article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Phone technology has witnessed revolutionary advancement in the form of smartphones. Health care professionals, especially orthopaedic surgeons, have been able to make the best use of such remarkable devices. Surveys conducted over years in many different countries have shown how often orthopaedic personnel use smartphone apps for both work and education. Moreover, phone companies have provided surgeons with many useful apps that can be used in the operating theater and emergency room as well. However, there are some concerns regarding the validity of information available in the applications.

Keywords

orthopaedic
relationship
smartphones
surgeon

Introduction

A smartphone is defined as a cellular telephone designed with an integrated computer which can execute a wide variety of tasks, including running various applications (apps) that are not typically found on a traditional cell phone. It is known by its manufacturer or operating system (OS), and the current leading systems are Blackberry, iPhone, and Android platforms. Among the most rapidly growing categories of programs, the medical apps are applications which include many programs designed specifically for orthopaedic surgeons assisting them not only in education but also in their surgical practice.1,2

How Often Do Orthopaedic Surgeons Use Smartphones?

In a survey, conducted in 2011, Franko3 found that more than half of the participants used smartphone apps in their clinical practice. Almost all of them were ready to pay an average of nearly $30 for an app that saves 5 to 10 minutes a day or 30 minutes per week. The most popular apps were textbooks, references, techniques, board reviews, and billing. Epocrates (Epocrates Inc), a free drug reference app, was mentioned by a huge number of participants as their most useful app, while Medscape (WebMD LLC), a drug and procedure reference, as their second most useful one.1,2 Another survey, performed in Australia by James Churchill4 in 2012, revealed that all but two reported using their phones for work on a regular basis. The survey results showed that 79% of the surgeons used mobile technology primarily for professional contact, and nearly 65% relied on online educational resources. The ability to view X-rays and other radiology imaging on their devices was the most desired future feature. Most orthopaedic caregivers who responded to the survey confirmed that the most fundamental role played by mobile phones is to access patient investigations and past records.

Should We Be Concerned about Using Smartphones?

Utility of smartphone apps rests in novelty, accessibility, and portability.3 Furthermore, smartphone-assisted surgery has proven to be advantageous in many ways, such as accurate digital angle measurements, not time consuming, no extra learning curve, not space occupying, and no radiation.5 However, the idea of using smartphone apps in clinical practice is not without concern. Currently, there is no way to regulate the content or validity of information in released programs.6 Besides, consumers either must independently verify the information provided or must trust the name of the app publisher. There are also relevant concerns regarding the lack of medical professional involvement in app design.7,8 While U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lied down regulations regarding medical smartphone apps, which nowadays have a significant impact on patient treatment, most medical smart-phone apps do not undergo a formal evaluation under the current guidelines.9 Another disadvantage of using smartphones intraoperatively is that the sterility may be compromised.5

Examples of Apps Available for Orthopaedic Surgeons

Although some articles state that few apps are designed for orthopaedic surgeons,3,10 Rohman and Boddice11 suggested many apps that can be of great value for orthopaedic trainee and specialists. Some examples include Netter's Atlas of Human Anatomy, Pastest, AO surgery reference, Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics and Orthobullets. These apps are highly beneficial from an educational point of view.

Furthermore, numerous apps have been developed to be used perioperatively. For instance, the accelerometer of the iPhone has been used to develop a new system to improve acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Peters et al5 used the Angle app (Smudge Apps) to measure inclination of the acetabular cup and the Camera Protractor app (YJ Soft) to determine anteversion. These results had a favorable outcome when compared with the literature on acetabular cup placements with both the freehand and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) techniques.12-14 Another application worth mentioning is measurement of the knee flexion angle by Jean-Yves Jenny15 in total knee arthroplasty. The results showed a good correlation and coherence between navigated and smartphone measurements, and there was a good intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the smartphone measurements. Another surgical subspecialty that made the best use of smartphones is foot and ankle surgery where Hallux Angles app (Ockendon.net, 2010, WGHealthcare, Letchworth Garden City, United Kingdom) and iPinPoint (i-smartsolutions, 2010, available at www.i-smartsolutions.com) represent a useful alternative to measure the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA), respectively.

Smartphones are beneficial not only in the operative theater but also in the emergency room. Now they are preferred over the traditional hospital pager systems which are no longer considered to be efficient.16 The literature suggests that photographic images of the injured extremities, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance images in video format and X-ray images of extremities can be sent to the orthopaedic consultants using WhatsApp application (WhatsApp Inc.). Therefore, orthopaedic consultants will be able to assess all the patient data wherever they are and deliver to the emergency physicians the medical decisions about the patient without needing to reach the emergency department in a short time.17

Conclusion

Smartphones are becoming more popular among medical personnel. Their apps are now considered indispensable for orthopaedic surgeons. Despite concerns about the reliability of their content, they have proven useful for both educational and surgical purposes.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. , , . Infectious diseases resources for the iPhone. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(09):1268-1274.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Medical apps for smartphones. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(01):17-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(07):2042-2048.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. . Mobile technology usage by orthopaedic surgeons and trainees in Australia. J Mob Technol Med. 2012;1(02):11-15.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Improving acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty by using smartphone technology. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(07):1324-1330.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Quality and content of Internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(07):1612-1618.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(09):e530-e534.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Medical professional involvement in smartphone ‘apps’ in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(01):220-221.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . The regulation of mobile health applications. BMC Med. 2012;10:46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . The uses of the iPhone for surgeons. Surgeon. 2011;9(01):44-48.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Letter To The Editor: Smartphone Apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Rela Res. 2013;471(03):1056-1057.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . A comparison between imageless navigated and manual freehand technique acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(07):1078-1082.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(03):593-597.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Computer assisted determination of acetabular cup orientation using 2D-3D image registration. Int J CARS. 2010;5(05):437-447.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. . Measurement of the knee flexion angle with a Smartphone-application is precise and accurate. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(05):784-787.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . The use of WhatsApp smartphone messaging improves communication efficiency within an orthopaedic surgery team. Cureus. 2017;9(02):e1040.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Use of WhatsApp application for orthopedic consultations in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(07):1305-1307.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections